As RTCool factors out: straight beams and curved beams carry related masses “in beam” if the ends of the curved beam aren’t constrained and/or the curvature ratio: peak/span could be very low: 1/20 and many others. In my most up-to-date designs I exploit parabolic arched columns to assist a curved roof, however the peak/span is approx 2/3 and I restrain the ends of the columns so the curved arch helps are principally carrying the gravity snow masses in arch compression, which could be very, very environment friendly. Wind aspect masses in opposition to my columns considerably rely on “in beam” power however they’re much less extreme masses than snow masses for my construction. In my local weather within the NW nook of the USA, snow masses in our mountains are important: 120-lbs per sq. foot (with security issue of 1.6 as is frequent within the ASCE constructing codes).
As talked about in my first publish above, I’m not a structural engineer, so my opinions are solely “novice blended with a little bit of expertise” and have to be evaluated in that gentle. That stated, I’ve spent the previous 2 years engaged on residential house designs in an effort to plot extra reasonably priced buildings, utilizing supplies extra effectively and much more vital: cut back the time to fabricate and assemble the dwelling to the best extent attainable. To that finish, I’ll gladly spend extra for a specific materials alternative, if in utilizing it, time to assemble is diminished much more.
SkyCiv FEA stress evaluation instruments have helped these efforts tremendously and given me some perception about numerous roof buildings and the beams employed to assist them. As others have talked about: 9m is a critical span for a residential construction, however not as troublesome if the masses your roof will see sooner or later are primarily wind masses (uplift is often the worst case for practically flat roofs) and never snow loading in your case. Maybe in your location snow masses are non-existent or very modest. If so my guess is your largest roof masses as talked about will seemingly be wind uplift. Relying on the form of your own home and the encircling topography (excessive on a mountain escarpment ?, on a flat plain however with few bushes to guard it ? …and many others) wind uplift on a flat roof can generate masses (in imperial items) of 8 – 20 kilos/sqft performing upwards in opposition to gravity, relying on the calculated wind velocity in your space in a gusting wind storm. -20psf could not sound like rather a lot however multiplied over the big floor space of your roof it generates substantial forces that work to tear the roof off your own home. Your roof beams and all of the elements of the roof that connect with them will want to withstand this upward drive in a wind storm. Usually your roof will work within the different path to carry the load of the roof and it’s supplies from shifting nearer to the bottom, however it’s the sudden forces, like wind uplift which have to be completely handled to maintain the inhabitants inside the home protected.
Typically roof beams additionally want to withstand what are referred to as “second forces”. These forces, for instance, can act to push a wall over in an earthquake, however the roof beams working along with different structural members, add stability, shear resistance and what you would possibly consider as torque resistance in order that sideways forces to the home are resisted. Correctly setup, SkyCiv can consider these forces in opposition to the home and the flexibility of the structural members to react safely.